Put another way, not one person would be impressed if an 8 core Intel CPU from late 2017 beat up on a quad core AMD CPU from 2015 by the margins we see in this article. CPU Hash would seem to deliver a resounding win for the Ryzen 5 2500U, but remember that the Zen architecture supports Intel’s SHA Extensions. What’s not to like? Has 2 more physical cores; Newer - released 1-year and 2-months later; Has 1 MB larger L3 cache size; 16% higher Turbo Boost frequency (3.6 GHz vs 3.1 GHz) Around 1.66 GB/s (5%) higher theoretical memory bandwidth; Benchmarks. I wouldn’t hesitate to grab a 2500U after reading this. Even with the Ryzen 5 2500U’s powerful Radeon IGP in the picture, it doesn’t open that much of a lead over the Acer Swift 3 with a Core i5-8250U alone inside. The Ryzen 5 2500U is the ultimate expression of AMD’s APU concept that we’ve tested so far. AMD might offer unlocked versions, or it might not. It looks faster than Iris Plus graphics on paper as well, though Intel hasn’t even begun rolling out those GPUs in quad-core ultraportable SKUs. As the spiky frame-time plots above suggested would happen, all of the IGPs post enough time past 50 ms that noticeable hitches and stutters will likely be the order of the day. Hi, I have HP Pavilion 15-cw0002 laptop with AMD Ryzen 2500U CPU but I have major issue running the laptop on battery. Disappointed yes,but not at performance.I think it leads it’s class in overall performance. "Run as Administrator": What Does It Mean? Despite the move to a single Zen core complex, however, the Ryzen 5 2500U doesn’t improve on its desktop counterparts’ tendency to post high memory access latency numbers. That’s because the 2500U’s SIMD units are half as wide as those of the i5-8250U’s, so even with a core-count and potential clock-speed advantage, we should only expect the AMD chip to end up slightly ahead of the i5-7200U. Professional artists want tilt-support and direction-senses, as well as eraser functionality IMO. 1. That thermal limit resulted in swings in clock speeds of a couple hundred MHz, so it could be that Doom just doesn’t react well to that kind of variance. And I’d think the mobile ryzen would look quite good then – yes the cpu overall might be somewhat slower (not by much really – this is very different to the previous AMD chips, you probably couldn’t tell in most cases) but the GPU definitely very noticeably faster, which seems reasonable to me. This does bring up the note though that it’s probably interesting to do a few of the benchmarks on battery power as well just as a sanity check if nothing else. With discrete graphics now within striking distance for price and battery life, why buy an APU and sacrifice performance? Reddit's patch for Cyberpunk 2077 yields double-digit performance gains on AMD CPUs. Great graphics (particularly as compared to the descrete MX 150), 4 capable cores, all in 15 watts. The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U is a mobile processor with 4 cores, launched in January 2019. If the 15W GT2 Cannonlake is capable of outperforming the GT3e Coffeelake, they wouldn’t release the latter. 12. While that sort of thing is obviously relevant to someone trying to play The Witcher on that laptop, it doesn’t really say anything interesting about architecture. 2 years ago When I look at something like the Surface Pro and other Windows tablets, I can't help but think this would be the perfect chip for something like that. etc. 18-20W for GPU. 2. Hopefully you find some decent tests to run. And you’ve been wrong before about the Rajachip (it’s most certainly a Vega GPU in there and even as an official internal AMD product number). Regarding the system costs,the X360 is part of the more expensive Envy range of 2 in 1 touchscreen laptops: To do an accurate battery comparison with different size installed screens – hook up an external monitor and turn off the built in screen and test the different laptops on the same monitor. The only difference would be the CPU and chipset. Cannonlake iGPU won’t beat Ryzen iGPU because Ryzen iGPU already beats the 28W Iris 650. But from what I can tell, the MX150 typically adds about ~100$ or so to the same system without the discrete GPU, and I’d nearly bet intel doesn’t actually sell the i5-8250 cheaper than AMD sells the Ryzen 2500U (though I have no idea what these chips actually cost, intel has price lists but you can completely forget about them for OEM parts). Some places on the web (yes I know…) claimed the CPU can be adjusted for 25 or 15W, and it’s the higher wattage option that is the default in the Envy. Part 2: https://youtu.be/IqGnYR_bNIgA Share or a Like helps a lot with that youtube algorithm and getting the word out. Given that the Ryzen 7 mobile should have peak GPU performance of about 45% over this Ryzen 5. 365. Sounds like a winner, right? what a shocker?! It would seem that Dota 2 is pretty CPU-bound with its Fastest preset, even on integrated graphics, and that’s bad news for IGPs sharing a common memory interface with a CPU. Is Ryzen 5 Better Than Intel i5. Definitely looking forward to battery life figures. With every generation of Intel iGPUs, many people say that the performance gap is “closing” and that they should be “good enough”. Unfortunately I can’t share much about the engineering side, so Ill concentrate on the astro photography side, which does demand a lot of cores and a good graphics card. I don’t think HP would have any problem sending such an old tech site like this a laptop just for the review,as either way whether they sell an AMD or Intel X360 they win both ways! I am still on edge when it comes to reviews ever since the CoffeeLake Multi-Core Enhancement fiasco from last month. Sweet Jeff! AMD Ryzen 5 Mobile 2500U @ 3492.92 MHz - CPU-Z VALIDATOR here with 45W TDP. I don’t see their dGPU investment that way. It’s not easy to hit a niche balancing CPU performance and acceptable IGP speed, especially within the thermal and power constraints of the ultrabook market. 35W Ryzen 7 mobile system should keep up with a 20-25W MX 150 and 15W Intel CPU just fine. I don’t know if that includes the dedicated memory or not. Cinebench R20 (Single-Core) Ryzen 5 3550H +2%. Gaming test encyclopedia (+70 Games in alphabetical order) Video. Join thousands of tech enthusiasts and participate. 87% faster in a single-core Geekbench v5 test - 1313 vs 702 points; More modern manufacturing process – 10 versus 14 nanometers; Newer PCI Express version – 4.0; 17% higher Turbo Boost frequency (4.2 GHz vs 3.6 GHz) Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2500U . The AMD chip isn’t that far behind a Kaby Lake Core i5 without Speed Shift enabled, but it’s no match for the Core i5-8250U in these results. The HDD is the main culprit for the lack of snappiness of the Ryzen 5 2500u laptop. CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM USB FPS EFPS YouTube *NEW* COMPARE BUILD TEST ABOUT × COMPARE. Our $750 test system pairs a Ryzen 5 2500U APU with a one-terabyte, 7200-RPM mechanical hard drive, 8 GB of dual-channel DDR4-2400 RAM, a 15.6″, 1920×1080 screen with a convertible hinge. Given the importance of Ryzen Mobile’s performance to the competitive landscape of mobile computing, we went out and bought one at retail to see how it handles. Compare The AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U w Against Other CPUs. Definitely I see those 1-stick configs on order forms from Dell & Lenovo though, even for decent hardware. UHD 620 might be hitting the higher clocks because of improved 14nm. Nice and thorough review, Jeff. Cinema 4 is a worldwide used software to create 3D forms. Could be a killer LAN machine! A more neutral compiler might make for a better benchmark, but it may also not be representative of real-world results with real-world software, and we are generally concerned with real-world performance. The 15.6″ HP Envy x360 that hosts the Ryzen 5 2500U has lots of metal in its expansive chassis, and it has a powerful-sounding and aggressive fan inside. It’s worth noting that while I understand the purpose in trying to “push the GPUs” in some of the tougher test cases, once you get too far into an unplayable range the relative results of the different GPUs do not necessarily generalize anymore to less stressful workloads. The Ryzen 5 2500U boasts a single-core Turbo speed of 3.6 GHz, a clock-for-clock match for Intel’s Core i5-8350U, and its base clock speed is 300 MHz higher than that of the Intel chip’s. 4GB of dedicated GDDR5 will win any GPU fight. (It’s slower RAM, though, at DDR4-2133, vs. 2400 for the HP.). While the workstations need some very bulky and energy consuming batteries or power supplies. I’ll save some pennies for the desktop version. Here, the Ryzen 5 2500U and the Core i5-8250U emerge dead-even. iGPU wise, it wins against intel but the gap is not as big as what I was expecting. … Would love to see this APU paired with a 20W AMD GPU for something CrossFire-ish. As long as he doesn’t use small fft’s prime, lol…. Rocket League is another wildly popular title with a runs-anywhere reputation. With our sampling rate reduced, we return to the VI portion of DAWBench. How does an APU compare to a DGPU if you took the same silicon and separated them. One still might need to tweak the graphics settings in these titles for the best experience on AMD’s Vega IGPs, but the red team offers considerably more breathing room than Intel’s IGPs do. Odd, it didn’t link my comment properly so here’s the text. Or just using Cinebench as a stresser? Battery-life wise it looks to be Ryzen Mobile is still in the pre-Haswell era generation. Relax the buffer size again, and the 2500U hangs right with the i5-8250U. Also, I little surprised how big the gap between UHD 620 and HD620 because both have same architecture and 24 EU. Do you have any insight on what differences we’d see if a manufacturer provisioned this CPU for 25W? iGPUs are probably memory-starved. I’d happily play The Witcher 3 on either of these systems, even if I would prefer the GeForce. With four Zen CPU cores and eight threads, plus as many as 640 Radeon Vega compute units, the Ryzen 5 2500U and Ryzen 7 2700U stuff a ton of potential computing horsepower into their 15W TDPs. average JPG Copy Test (av. And nvidia MX 150 still beat it by huge margin. In comparison, the Intel Core i5-8250U powered Acer Swift 3 … When Enmotus FuzeDrive was enabled, a Samsung 950 PRO NVMe drive was added to the drive pool. I think you’re right. They hypothesize that this maybe a Vega driver issue. $750 for Ryzen 5 2500U + a 1TB mechanical spinner…. Components that offer the best value for money have great performance (yellow) and a low price (green). Intel’s latest Coffee Lake CPUs have closed the multithreaded performance gap in much of our testing, but the company’s continued insistence on careful feature segmentation and the spotty availability of Coffee Lake parts in general has made the blue team’s next-gen broadside less damaging to the resurgent AMD than one might expect so far. Even if it’s not configured for 25 Watt TDP, if the Swift 3 14″ has a beefier cooling solution than the X360 Envy, it would be able to maintain higher boost clocks for longer periods of time, thus making this an unfair comparison. test.result. I suspect the Core M parts could be beaten in efficiency that way, and the tablet Atoms blown out of the water if you underclock and disable enough. A side tought, I’d like to know how this notebook fares in crypto-mining, perhaps this is the first nb that can repay itself in the hands of a student at school/college/university. For the price of this Envy you can pick up a 15″ Dell with a GTX 1050 and quad-core CPU. I guess if you were running a file server that might make for a tiny bit of power savings, but otherwise I don’t see much practical use. There is no appreciable difference for the end user, and it outperforms all these others fairly easily by a wide margin, in all graphics tasks and number crunching applications that use all cores consuming very little power while doing so. Let’s kick off our gaming tests with one of the most popular games on the planet today. Nvidia being in such a strong position probably meant they weren’t interested in that implementation. There's also rumors of a Dell Inspiron that's gonna have it. Intel Core i5-3570 vs. AMD Ryzen 5 2500U - Benchmark, Geekbench 5, Cinebench R20, Cinebench R23, Cinebench R15 and FP32 iGPU (GFLOPS) benchmark results The Vega 8 IGP is definitely somewhat faster than the Intel parts, but its 99th-percentile frame time isn’t much better. Any virtues of the Ryzen APU are eclipsed by the agony of tangling with the limits of mechanical storage. As dirty as this makes me feel, I agree with chuckula. (‘ω’), A portable computer, basically a DTR, but in a slimmer form factor due to not having to design for battery power, or dual power sources (battery/AC). Given those workloads, it’s no shock that the Alienware 13 R3 comes out on top, but the Ryzen 5 2500U finally has an opportunity to demonstrate superiority over even the MX150-powered Acer Swift 3. ... For example the Acer Swift 3 clocks the Vega 10 at 800MHz during the first 15 minutes of a torture test, and then it goes down to 650MHz. In a range of other titles, the Vega 8 IGP provides much better gameplay experiences than Intel’s entry-level IGPs, presuming that a given title can be made playable on the blue team’s IGPs at all. Thermal Solution (PIB) Wraith Spire. Därför är det extra intressant att vi har en AMD-driven modell från HP på vårt kontor. Here are the specifications of our test systems: Our thanks to Intel for providing the three Acer Swift 3 systems for our testing. In the single-threaded portion of the benchmark, the Ryzen 5 2500U beats out the Speed Shift-less i5-7200U, and it only narrowly trails the Core i5-8250U and i7-7700HQ. So I think Techreport made a wise move with regards to battery-life testing. I agree, it’s not that easy to find accurate in-depth tests without passing by TR. Yeah… where were all the people telling anybody about how “great” Intel IGPs were? 25W would include the memory+MC I turned on Best Looking while keeping resolution at 1920×1080. AMD Ryzen 5 – Test Setup. Our compiling benchmark has always had a scent of Amdahl’s Law about it. Could then have relegated MX150 and below to obsolete. Terms of Use Privacy Policy Change Ad Consent Advertise. Even if they get the 15W Cannonlake parts out, they plan to release GT3e Coffeelake parts. For more information on the guts of Ryzen Mobile, be sure to check out my launch-day coverage. Cinebench seems to like AMD CPUs, and AMD certainly likes talking up Cinebench in its CPU marketing, so let’s see whether this win carries over to other CPU rendering tasks. CompuBench 1.5 Mobile CompuBench 2.0 Desktop Compute Performance of AMD Ryzen 5 2500U with Radeon Vega Graphics CPU; GPU; SSD; HDD; RAM; USB; CPU RANKINGS. AMD Ryzen 5 2500U, AMD Radeon RX 560X (Laptop) x 1, 8192 MB, 64-bit Windows 10} Again, its quite amazing Vega 8 can beat GT3e without having eDRAM. After my first glimpse of those results, I re-ran the test from scratch to see if I could get better performance, to no avail. I appreciate the review. Price and performance details for the AMD Ryzen 5 2500U can be found below. Given the “in-house” results that AMD issued we were led to believe that you’d need that MX-150 GPU on an Intel system just to match a Ryzen IGP, but that doesn’t appear to be the case. That would be apples to apple – then having the results with the built in screen would also be nice. It is part of the Ryzen 5 lineup, using the Zen (Raven Ridge) architecture with Socket FP5. Some portions of the test are even OpenCL-enabled. Graphics . Intel Core i7-4800MQ vs AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2500U: 23. In cases with discrete GPUs the battery often can’t even supply enough power to run the system at full tilt so the GPU is often heavily underclocked on battery. The Ryzen 5 2500U stomps all over the Intel’s mobile CPU lineup, but again lags behind the GeForce MX150. They presumably already have that cooling capacity with the MX150 in the chassis. We chose the “bmw27” test file from Blender’s selection of benchmark scenes to put our CPUs through their paces. Close. That’s fair enough, I guess. The essentials benchmark tests web-browsing performance, video conferencing, and a range of app start-up times. My favorite part of Intel IGPs were fans telling me how great they were…maybe twice the perf for only five times the money! That left the significantly-more-demanding The Witcher 3 to serve as my older triple-A test mule. Before I dive into these numbers, I should be clear that we’re not trying to slag any of these chips by going with this setup. Considering how precious that kind of performance is for a responsive user experience, AMD and its partners will have to make the case that the all-around competence of the Ryzen Mobile APU is worth trading away a bit of the single-threaded oomph of Kaby Lake Refresh for a broad swath of users. You can’t have fast without slow, and Dota 2 offers a preset called Best Looking that turns up all of the game’s eye candy and returns resolution scaling to 100%. Or alternatively, the i5 one at the same cost but without the mx150. We otherwise left the preset at its default settings. Ryzen 5 2500u is the tech enthusiast in the 2017. UserBenchmark USA-User . Since you seem to want it to go this way. On this page, you'll find out which processor has better performance in benchmarks, games and other useful information. CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM USB FPS EFPS YouTube *NEW* COMPARE BUILD TEST ABOUT × COMPARE. It tends to be very memory-bandwidth intensive. Our $750 test system pairs a Ryzen 5 2500U APU with a one-terabyte, 7200-RPM mechanical hard drive, 8 GB of dual-channel DDR4-2400 RAM, a 15.6″, 1920×1080 screen with a convertible hinge. The GeForce MX150 and its dedicated GDDR5 RAM score a major victory over the IGPs here in both performance potential and delivered smoothness. In the no-holds-barred arena afforded by 95W-and-higher TDPs, Intel can often clock its client cores to the moon and render discussions of IPC differences versus Zen moot in the wash of its chips’ clock-rocket exhaust. For all its spikiness at these settings, the Vega 8 spends far, far less time than the Intel IGPs past the 50-ms mark. 16.7 ms correlates to 60 FPS, that golden mark that we’d like to achieve (or surpass) for each and every frame, while a constant stream of frames at 8.3-ms intervals would correspond to 120 FPS. Ryzen 7. When Enmotus FuzeDrive was enabled, a Samsung 950 PRO NVMe drive was added to the drive pool. That may create awkward results where a faster chip is slower, depending on how resources are apportioned. Also, the higher RAM speeds. 10% faster in a single-core Geekbench v5 test - 774 vs 702 points; Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2500U. The GeForce’s average-FPS result with these settings is still flirting with a playable experience, but its 40.5-ms 99th-percentile frame time suggests some bumps in the road. There is one system with an RX 560+Ryzen APU: the Acer Nitro 5. Are there efficiencies to be gained in shared components? We don’t know anything about desktop Raven Ridge yet. We’d still have to relax some eye candy to get Dota 2 above the 30-FPS bar that’s widely accepted as “playable” for this class of product, but the AMD IGP is a lot closer to clearing that bar than Intel’s latest. System Configs: AMD Ryzen 5 1600X, GA-AX370 AORUS Gaming 5 motherboard, 16GB of dual-channel DDR3-3200, Graphics driver 23.20.768.0 (17.40), and a Seagate Barracuda 500GB boot drive. CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM USB FPS EFPS YouTube *NEW* COMPARE BUILD TEST ABOUT × COMPARE. The Ryzen 5 2500U finally gives the red chipmaker a competent alternative to Intel's mainstream CPU lineup for Ultrabooks. The complete laptop package should be considered. The most important threshold to consider is at 16.7 ms, where the Vega 8 spends almost a quarter of the time that the UHD Graphics 620 does on frames that would drop the delivered frame rate below 60 FPS. AMD’s renewed competitiveness in the enthusiast desktop is a border skirmish compared to the war it’s getting ready to wage in the mobile-CPU marketplace. We used the latest version of the Reaper DAW for Windows as the platform for our tests. There would be no difference if the TDPs are still dynamically shared. 8. While plugged in laptops are obviously a relevant usage model, I still question the utility of getting a laptop if it is *never* going to be unplugged . The first graph shows the relative performance of the CPU compared to the 10 other common (single) CPUs in terms of PassMark CPU Mark. Kaby Lake Refresh brings the same four cores and eight threads to 15W CPUs that AMD is targeting with the CPU side of the Ryzen Mobile family. Even at this low resolution, we avoid the apparent CPU-bound coffin corner that Dota 2 hits with its lowest preset. Corona, as its developers put it, is a “high-performance (un)biased photorealistic renderer, available for Autodesk 3ds Max and as a standalone CLI application, and in development for Maxon Cinema 4D.”. would a dual-graphics solution even work splitting the load between GCN and Vega? To be fair, results like this indicate something pathological is going on with the test case/driver/etc, not really anything about the hardware… like OS paging memory every frame or something (Witcher) or just immature vulkan driver (DOOM). Like this review? AMD Ryzen 5 2500U CPU Benchmark. The correct comparison, architecture-wise, is between iGPU only. PCMark 10 tests some things that we don’t have tools for, like video conferencing, app launch times, and general productivity performance with common office apps like LibreOffice Writer and Calc. I wanted to test Tomb Raider‘s 2013 reboot on the Ryzen 5 2500U to get a sense of how it compared to the Intel IGPs in that title, but the Radeon’s drivers forced vsync on with Tomb Raider regardless of the in-game settings I chose. Specifically Vega graphics. It has 25% more bandwidth (64 bit @ 6000 vs. 128 bit @ 2400), but that’s dedicated bandwidth. Power consumption and battery life is harder to test and comment on, but we’ll get to that later. Or, if they want to compare “apples to apples”, getting the HP Envy x360 Intel i5 8250U would be the most obvious choice (as it’d have the same screen, RAM, 1tb hard drive, stylus, and touch screen). I would be incredibly surprised if it worked out that way for reasons you already outlined – sharing memory bandwidth is always a huge constraint. That’s a minor nit-pick though, as ever, the TechReport review might not be the first, but it’s always worth waiting for. Sure, but there are a lot of applications that would greatly benefit from an extremely power efficient CPU. I have to say though… we had some discussions not long ago where people told me I was wrong in saying that these APUs wouldn’t perform anywhere close to an RX 550. AMDs in there, but it’s very much an Intel product, AMD margins unknown. The productivity test checks word-processing acuity and spreadsheet performance with both lightweight and heavy-duty number-crunching. Not bad. The 620 is not that, in fairness. I actually read this the opposite way. However, that’s basically what we see here, and frankly I remain unimpressed given the fact that Intel has yet to basically copy the GPU architecture of one of its major rivals and pretend that it was “innovated” out of thin air. Very happy to see AMD competing so well in this market again. Considering that PCMark is a one-click test, it was hardly a burden at all to rotate it in for this review. Archived. If you prefer high resolution to high frame rates in Rocket League, the Vega 8 IGP can do it. They give CPU performance very close to the Intel option, and blow the Intel GPU out of the water. Also, I am sorry that I was being an ass earlier with the whole “take down the review” thing. Going by this review it doesn’t look like the R7 2700u will be able to catch the MX150, but how close it will get to it is very hard to estimate. The conslusion that should be taken here is that Ryzen has a strong showing and certainly provides playable performance for broader set of games than the Intel laptops. AMD Ryzen™ 5 3600XT Desktop Processor for Gamers # of CPU Cores. TECHSPOT : Tech Enthusiasts, Power Users, Gamers, TechSpot is a registered trademark. “And you’ve been wrong before about the Rajachip (it’s most certainly a Vega GPU in there and even as an official internal AMD product number).”, Try this more up to date information instead: [url, “Also you could post links to the real benchmarks that show this dominance. All that performance comes from the same total CPU power budget on paper as that of Intel’s latest chips, too, so AMD has undeniably crammed an impressive amount of graphics oomph into one low-power package. The DAWBench DSP test is less about agility and more about pure multithreaded grunt. Handbrake is a popular video-transcoding app that recently hit version 1.0.7. Thanks for the response! AMD Ryzen 5 2500U ⭐avis. They even updated the article with new drivers from HP and noted that the CPU usage during video playback was quite low so it’s not like there was a software bug that was preventing the GPU from handling video offload duties. Hopefully we’ll be able to find out with time. The digital-content-creation portion of this test covers three phases: photo editing tasks with large raw files from a range of DSLRs (some parts of which are OpenCL-enabled), video editing across both CPU and OpenCL code paths, and rendering and visualization of 3D models. Nothing about these mobile CPUs is unlocked, so faster RAM will likely run at the highest multiplier the processor supports by default (i.e. This would be a much more interesting test than looping videos as HotHardware did. HP also seems to have put a 6-bit IPS panel of some kind in the Envy x360 to show the output of the Vega 8 IGP to the world, another decision that puts the wrong foot forward for this system. You sound a bit sore. The Alienware 13 R3 playing host to our Core i7-7700HQ is my personal system and was not provided by a manufacturer for evaluation. These latency-sensitive, single-threaded Javascript workloads confirm some of PCMark’s lighter-weight numbers. Without a doubt, the Ryzen 5 2500U and Ryzen 7 2700U are AMD’s best and most competitive mobile APUs ever. Ryzen CPUs generally bring more cores and threads to the table than equivalently-priced Intel CPUs, and recent sales have made it easier than ever to get gobs of multithreaded computing power for less. 33 ms correlates to 30 FPS, or a 30-Hz refresh rate. The chip spends barely any time on tough frames that take longer than 33.3 ms to produce, so one can be assured of a consistently smooth experience at Doom‘s tougher moments, even if its gameplay isn’t as fluid as I’d like.